Skip to main content

Table 1 Assessment of the importance of the defined outcomes

From: The GRADE approach for assessing new technologies as applied to apheresis devices in ulcerative colitis

Outcomes of interest for the first question

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

Importance

1. Clinical remission one month after treatment

8

9

9

9

8

CRITICAL

2. Endoscopic remission one month after treatment

6

8

7

8

7

CRITICAL

3. Percentage of patients with mild adverse effects

8

6

7

6

5

IMPORTANT

4. Percentage of patients with moderate-to-severe adverse effects

9

8

9

8

8

CRITICAL

5. Clinical remission 12 months after treatment

7

6

8

6

8

IMPORTANT#

Outcomes of interest for the second question

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

Importance

1. Percentage of patients who don't require corticosteroids one month after treatment

8

9

8

8

8

CRITICAL

2. Mean Reduction of Corticosteroids dose one month after treatment

9

6

7

6

6

IMPORTANT

3. Clinical remission one month after treatment (no corticosteroids)

8

8

7

8

8

CRITICAL

4. Endoscopic remission one month after treatment (no corticosteroids)

7

8

6

6

8

IMPORTANT#

5. Improvement of Quality of life (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, or IBDQ)

7

8

8

6

9

CRITICAL

6. Colectomy rate during the follow-up

9

9

9

8

9

CRITICAL

7. Percentage of patients with long-term adverse effects

9

8

8

8

9

CRITICAL

8. Clinical remission 12 months after treatment

7

6

7

7

8

CRITICAL

  1. *R1: Researcher n1; R2: Researcher n2; R3: Researcher n3; R4: Researcher n4; R5: Researcher n5.
  2. # The group resolved by discussion that these outcomes should be considered as Important outcomes