Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John N Lavis
8 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fierlbeck
24 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey
Resubmission - Version 2
24 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katherine Fierlbeck
20 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John N Lavis
23 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John N Lavis
20 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Deirdre McCaughey
Resubmission - Version 7
11 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
26 May 2010 Editorially accepted
26 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-39

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement