Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Part I, Patient perspective: activating patients to engage their providers in the use of evidence-based medicine: a qualitative evaluation of the VA Project to Implement Diuretics (VAPID)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - H Bosworth
9 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Schmittdiel
4 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Heather Schacht Reisinger
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Schmittdiel
8 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Heather Schacht Reisinger
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Heather Schacht Reisinger
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Heather Schacht Reisinger
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
18 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement