Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Powell
15 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gene Feder
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gene Feder
17 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Powell
31 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 7
6 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
9 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
9 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement