Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachael Powell |
| 15 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gene Feder |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 11 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gene Feder |
| 17 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachael Powell |
| 31 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 31 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 6 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 6 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
