Trends in publications regarding evidence-practice gaps: A literature review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eddy Lang|
|31 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Ramsay|
|23 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Ann Evensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eddy Lang|
|8 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Ramsay|
|21 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Ann Evensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|3 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-5-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.