Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Trends in publications regarding evidence-practice gaps: A literature review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eddy Lang
31 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Ramsay
23 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ann Evensen
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eddy Lang
8 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Ramsay
21 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ann Evensen
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
3 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-5-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement