Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence-based practice implementation: The impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Elovainio
17 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
11 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 3
8 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Elovainio
10 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
14 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Aarons
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
31 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-4-83

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement