Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Multiple goals and time constraints: perceived impact on physicians' performance of evidence-based behaviours

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Lawton
26 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Parchman
15 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Florian Vogt
15 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Justin Presseau
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Justin Presseau
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Justin Presseau
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
19 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Justin Presseau
Resubmission - Version 8
19 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
23 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Justin Presseau
Resubmission - Version 10
23 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
26 Nov 2009 Editorially accepted
26 Nov 2009 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-4-77

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement