This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
© Elwyn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 10 July 2008
Accepted: 31 December 2008
Published: 31 December 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jul 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - A Loh|
|18 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Armstrong|
|22 Sep 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Glyn Elwyn|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Sep 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Dec 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Glyn Elwyn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Dec 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Dec 2008||Editorially accepted|
|31 Dec 2008||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-3-57|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.