Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - A Loh
18 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Armstrong
22 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Glyn Elwyn
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Glyn Elwyn
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Dec 2008 Editorially accepted
31 Dec 2008 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-3-57

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement