Table 2 Survey results of the respondents on the CLIP process (n = 78)
CLIP process comments | N (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | Little (1–2) | 3 | Very (4–5) | N/O* | Missing |
Intensity of participation | 43 (55%) | 20 (26%) | 11 (14%) | - | 4 (5%) |
Appreciation of CLIP elements: | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Discussion forums | 14 (18%) | 15 (19%) | 33 (42%) | 12 (15%) | 4 (5%) |
   Anonymous questionnaires | 8 (10%) | 16 (21%) | 17 (22%) | 32 (41%) | 5 (6%) |
   CLIP symposia | 5 (6%) | 4 (5%) | 39 (50%) | 26 (33%) | 4 (5%) |
   Overall CLIP process | 6 (8%) | 13 (17%) | 52 (67%) | 3 (4%) | 4 (5%) |
Improvement between initial and final versions of recommendations | 7 (9%) | 20 (26%) | 33 (42%) | 13 (17%) | 5 (6%) |
Influence of participant comments on final recommendations | 9 (12%) | 18 (23%) | 25 (32%) | 22 (28%) | 4 (5%) |
Opportunity to intervene in the CLIP process | 13 (17%) | 12 (15%) | 40 (51%) | 8 (10%) | 5 (6%) |
|  | Never | 1–5 | 6–10 | >11 | Missing |
Frequency of CLIP website visits | 5 (6%) | 32 (41%) | 15 (19%) | 22 (28%) | 4 (5%) |