Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Incorporating a gender perspective into the development of clinical guidelines: a training course for guideline developers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Mar 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Safia Qureshi
23 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers
25 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Debby Keuken
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Debby Keuken
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Safia Qureshi
30 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers
18 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Debby Keuken
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Debby Keuken
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Nov 2007 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2007 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-2-35

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement