Skip to main content

Table 1 Diabetic foot documentation

From: Peer chart audits: A tool to meet Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency in practice-based learning and improvement

Variable

Total (n = 347)

Audit #1 (n = 105)

Audit #2 (n = 142)

Audit #3 (n = 100)

p Value Trend

Number of visits past year, mean ± SD

3.8 ± 2.5

3.9 ± 2.7

3.4 ± 2.6

3.8 ± 1.9

-

History or Review of Systems

     

   Any mention of feet?

170 (51%)

48 (49%)

63 (46%)

59 (59%)

0.16

   Any neuropathy symptoms?

107 (32%)

28 (29%)

52 (38%)

27 (27%)

0.80

   Any mention of claudication?

47 (14%)

15 (15%)

21 (15%)

11 (11%)

0.38

   Any mention of skin problem of feet?

92 (28%)

32 (33%)

36 (27%)

24 (24%)

0.16

Any documented?

189 (55%)

59 (56%)

68 (48%)

62 (62%)

0.42

All documented?

23 (7%)

7 (7%)

11 (8%)

5 (5%)

0.64

Prevalence of Foot Exam Abnormalities

     

   Any neurological abnormality?

79 (24%)

19 (19%)

36 (27%)

24 (24%)

0.45

   Any vascular abnormality?

54 (16%)

14(14%)

25 (18%)

15 (15%)

0.87

   Any skin abnormality?

82 (25%)

27 (28%)

37 (27%)

18 (18%)

0.11

Any abnormality?

132 (38%)

37 (35%)

62 (44%)

33 (33%)

0.76

Intervention for Foot Care

     

   Any foot care recommendation?

72 (21%)

19 (20%)

34 (24%)

19 (19%)

0.91

   Any foot care referral?

36 (11%)

13 (13%)

17 (12%)

6 (6%)

0.10

   Any vascular evaluation referral?

13 (4%)

6 (6%)

3 (2%)

4 (4%)

0.44

Any intervention?

87 (25%)

27 (26%)

39 (28%)

21 (21%)

0.45