Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Apr 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jamie Brehaut|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jamie Brehaut|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Jun 2007||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jun 2007||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-2-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.