Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Health researchers in Alberta: an exploratory comparison of defining characteristics and knowledge translation activities

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
18 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Tetroe
5 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Amanda Newton
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
6 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Tetroe
2 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Amanda Newton
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Amanda Newton
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Jan 2007 Editorially accepted
4 Jan 2007 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-2-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement