Open Peer Review Reports for: Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Michie |
| 2 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reuben McDaniel |
| 20 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Martin Eccles |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Michie |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
