Table 3 Reflective analysis process for experiential data
1. The transcribed text from the structured, interview-based reflection was affirmed or modified to create an accurate description of an interviewee's facilitation experience through the following steps: |
|---|
• Initial agreement between the interviewer (CBS) and recorder (ML), |
• Review of this "cleaned" recording by the interviewee, and |
• Revision by the interviewer/recorder until agreement was reached with the interviewee. |
2. One of the implementation experts performed an initial question-based conceptual analysis of each individual interview (CBS), after which the interviewer/recorder reached consensus as needed, followed by two additional steps: |
• Conceptual review of this product by the interviewee for its affirmation or alternative interpretations as needed, and |
• Revision by the interviewer/recorder until agreement was reached with the interviewee. |
3. The interviewer, recorder and a member of the PARIHS framework team (JR-M) reached consensus on a final thematic analysis and cross-case synthesis relative to pre-established exploration questions across the accumulated interview data. |
• Review of this product by each interviewee, |
• A final telephone discussion with each interviewee to obtain general consensus on the content/format of the report, and |
• Review of final draft by all members of the team, with final decisions based on common perceptions. |