Skip to main content

Table 1 Taxonomy of barriers and facilitators and their definitions

From: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions

Knowledge

Lack of awareness

Inability to correctly acknowledge the existence of shared decision-making (SDM) [27]

Lack of familiarity

Inability to correctly answer questions about SDM content, as well as self-reported lack of familiarity [27]

Forgetting

Inadvertently omitting to implement SDM [41]

Attitudes

Lack of agreement with specific components of shared decision-making

   • Interpretation of evidence

Not believing that specific elements of SDM are supported by scientific evidence [27]

   • Lack of applicability

 

â—‹ Characteristics of the patient

Lack of agreement with the applicability of SDM to practice population based on the characteristics of the patient [27]

â—‹ Clinical situation

Lack of agreement with the applicability of SDM to practice population based on the clinical situation [27]

   • Asking patient about his/her the preferred role in decision-making

Lack of agreement with a specific component of SDM such as asking patients about their preferred role in decision-making [27]

   • Asking patient about support or undue pressure

Lack of agreement with a specific component of SDM such as asking patients about support and/or undue pressure [27]

   • Asking about values/clarifying values

Lack of agreement with a specific component of SDM such as asking patients about values [27]

   • Not cost-beneficial

Perception that there will be increased costs if SDM is implemented [28]

   • Lack of confidence in the developers

Lack of confidence in the individuals who are responsible for developing or presenting SDM [27]

Lack of agreement in general

   • "Too cookbook" – too rigid to be applicable

Lack of agreement with SDM because it is too artificial [27]

   • Challenge to autonomy

Lack of agreement with SDM because it is a threat to professional autonomy [27]

   • Biased synthesis

Perception that the authors were biased [27]

   • Not practical

Lack of agreement with SDM because it is unclear or impractical to follow [28]

   • Total lack of agreement with using the model (not specified why)

Lack of agreement with SDM in general (unspecified) [27]

Lack of expectancy

   • Patient's outcome

Perception that performance following the use of SDM will not lead to improved patient outcome [27]

   • Health care process

Perception that performance following the use of SDM will not lead to improved health care process [28]

   • Feeling expectancy

Perception that performance following the use of SDM will provoke difficult feelings and/or does not take into account existing feelings [28]

Lack of self-efficacy

Belief that one cannot perform SDM [27]

Lack of motivation

Lack of motivation to use SDM or to change one's habits [27]

Behaviour

External barriers

   • Factors associated with patient

â—‹ Preferences of patients

Perceived inability to reconcile patient preferences with the use of SDM [27]

   • Factors associated with shared decision-making as an innovation

â—‹ Lack of triability

Perception that SDM cannot be experimented with on a limited basis [30]

â—‹ Lack of compatibility:

Perception that SDM is not consistent with one's own approach [30]

â—‹ Complexity

Perception that SDM is difficult to understand and to put into use [30]

â—‹ Lack of observability

Lack of visibility of the results of using SDM [30]

â—‹ Not communicable

Perception that it is not possible to create and share information with one another in order to reach a mutual understanding of SDM [30]

â—‹ Increased uncertainty

Perception that the use of SDM will increase uncertainty (for example, lack of predictability, of structure, of information [30]

â—‹ Not modifiable/way of doing it

Lack of flexibility in the degree to which SDM is not changeable or modifiable by a user in the process of its adoption and implementation [30]

   • Factors associated with environmental factors

â—‹ Time pressure

Insufficient time to put SDM into practice [30]

â—‹ Lack of resources

Insufficient materials or staff to put SDM into practice [28]

â—‹ Organizational constraints

Insufficient support from the organization

â—‹ Lack of access to services

Inadequate access to actual or alternative health care services to put SDM into practice [28]

â—‹ Lack of reimbursement

Insufficient reimbursement for putting SDM into practice [28]

â—‹ Perceived increase in malpractice liability

Risk of legal actions is increased if SDM is put into practice [28]

â—‹ Sharing responsibility with Patient*

Using SDM lowers the responsibility of the health professional because it is shared with patient

  1. * Only for the facilitator assessment taxonomy