Open Peer Review Reports for: Implementation science: a role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pat Croskerry |
| 20 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maggie Toplak |
| 23 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maggie Toplak |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 25 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Sladek |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-1-12 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
