Core competencies in the science and practice of knowledge translation: description of a Canadian strategic training initiative
© Straus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 April 2011
Accepted: 9 December 2011
Published: 9 December 2011
Globally, healthcare systems are attempting to optimize quality of care. This challenge has resulted in the development of implementation science or knowledge translation (KT) and the resulting need to build capacity in both the science and practice of KT.
We are attempting to meet these challenges through the creation of a national training initiative in KT. We have identified core competencies in this field and have developed a series of educational courses and materials for three training streams. We report the outline for this approach and the progress to date.
We have prepared a strategy to develop, implement, and evaluate a national training initiative to build capacity in the science and practice of KT. Ultimately through this initiative, we hope to meet the capacity demand for KT researchers and practitioners in Canada that will lead to improved care and a strengthened healthcare system.
Globally, health systems fail to optimally use evidence with resulting inefficiencies and reduced quantity and quality of life [1–6]. Recognition of this challenge has created interest in knowledge translation (KT) or implementation science. This growing emphasis on KT has led to the establishment of an interdisciplinary field of KT research and the need to enhance capacity in KT to meet the demand.
Providing innovative training centres and laboratories for trainees from various research disciplines (including clinical epidemiology, health services research, social sciences, engineering, and health informatics, and from different professions including medicine, nursing, engineering, and psychology) to develop skills in KT and KT research.
Linking trainees and mentors to collaboratively advance the science and practice of KT.
Partnering with other national and international research groups to promote KT research and training of well-rounded trainees across a range of settings, and clinical and health system issues.
In our literature search to identify KT training initiatives, we were unable to identify any national KT training strategies that we could model. To develop our strategy, we considered the need to advance both the science and practice of KT and decided that to enhance capacity we should focus training on three streams: Stream 1 includes graduate (MSc and PhD) and advanced (postdoctoral) training in the science and practice of KT; Stream 2 includes training in the basic principles of the science and practice of KT for researchers from other areas such as basic science and health services research; and Stream 3 includes basic training in the practice of KT for any knowledge users interested in enhancing their knowledge and skills for practicing KT.
The KT Training Streams
Several educational theories and principles can guide the development of an educational program. Common elements that form the basis of our program include the assessment of learning needs, facilitation of social interaction between learners, and provision of opportunities to practice new skills . People have different learning styles, and inclusion of a range of teaching techniques are used to meet these needs including active learning through small group work, interactive discussions (seminars and asynchronous discussions), and brief didactic sessions . Elements of cognitive learning theory influence the program development of Stream 1, particularly the use of mentorship to support learners . Adult learning theory influences all streams, assuming that learners have acquired knowledge, are motivated to learning material relevant to their needs and are self-directed.
Stream 1 training
This stream focuses on the science and practice of KT including skills in the research methods relevant to the phases of the MRC Framework. The practice of KT focuses on skill development in end-of-grant KT (disseminating research results and engaging stakeholders in using them) and integrated KT (collaborative activities that engage knowledge users to ensure that the research is relevant to and used by the knowledge users).
The core competencies for Stream 1 trainees are based on the MRC and KTA Frameworks and include: knowledge and understanding of models and theories of KT and KT research; capacity to conduct syntheses to address KT questions, specifically reviews of complex interventions which may include consideration of qualitative and quantitative research; capacity in multiple research methods including qualitative methods to examine the determinants of knowledge use across different settings and stakeholder groups; and capacity to design and evaluate the impact, effectiveness, and sustainability of KT strategies in different settings.
Overarching each of these competencies is the need to develop skills in engaging relevant stakeholders (including the public, healthcare providers, managers, and policy makers) to facilitate an integrated KT approach.
Core competencies for Stream 1 trainees and educational initiatives targeting these competencies
Models and theories of KT and KT research
Research methods in KT
Developing, evaluating, sustaining KT Interventions
Modular courses in systematic reviews, pragmatic randomized trials, end-of-grant KT
Monthly e-seminar series
Summary of Courses Available in 2011
Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine
Trainees, researchers, physicians, knowledge users, et al.
Trainees, researchers, physicians, knowledge users, et al.
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
STIHR trainees, other trainees, researchers, physicians, knowledge users, et al.
Winter 2011 - STIHR trainees Fall 2011 - Others
Pragmatic KT Trials
STIHR trainees, other trainees, researchers, physicians, knowledge users, et al.
Topics for KT Canada Monthly Seminar Series
Implementation Science - a Letter from the UK
Dr Martin Eccles
Supporting Research Use by Health System Managers and Policymakers
Dr John Lavis
A Shared Decision Making Approach to Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
Dr France Légaré
Ethical Challenges in Knowledge Translation Research
Dr Charles Weijer
Patient Decision Aids as a Knowledge Translation Strategy: Opportunities and Barriers
Dr Annette O'Connor
Cluster RCT Comparing Three Methods of Implementing Practice Guidelines for Children with Croup
Dr. David Johnson
Collaborative Journal Clubs: Can Bottom Up Implementation Work?
Prof Paul Glasziou
How We Use the Language of KT, and Its Challenges: Time for Changes?
Dr Ann McKibbon
The Influence of Social Networks on KT in Long Term Care Facilities
Dr Anne Sales
A Cognitive Perspective of Knowledge Translation
Dr Jamie Brehaut
Advancements in Development, Reporting and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Introducing AGREE II
Dr Melissa Brouwers
Translating Nutrition Research into Practice: A Look at Novel Strategies to Improve Evidence-Based Diet-Related Decisions
Dr Sophie Desroches
Making Guidelines Easier to Follow: Bridging Best Evidence and a Clear Message
Dr Onil Bhattacharyya and Dr Monika Kastner (Post-Doctoral Fellow)
Lost in Translation: How I Found the Way
Dr Ian Graham
Storytelling as a KT Strategy in Child Health: Croup as an Illustrative Example
Drs Lisa Hartling, Terry Klassen and Shannon Scott
KT Trials Must Overcome both Poor Practitioner and Patient Performance
Dr Brian Haynes
Sustainability of KT Innovations
Dr Barbara Davies
Studying the Use of Research Knowledge in Public Bureaucracies
Dr Mathieu Ouimet
Policy Makers and Researchers as Partners in Knowledge Mobilization
Ms Nancy Reynolds and Dr Suzanne Tough
Required Versus Inspired Partnerships: Report on a Survey of Researchers and Knowledge-Users Holding Integrated KT Grants
Ms Jacqueline Tetroe
KT Research at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute: Using
Psychological Theory to Improve the Implementation of a Hand Hygiene Intervention
Dr Veronique Boscart
and Dr Susan Jaglal
Supporting evidence based practice through information technologies
Dr Diane Doran
Evidence-based self-management: translation of knowledge into a self-management tool for patients with urinary incontinence
Dr Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
Translating knowledge to support e-health implementation in healthcare: A multidimensional approach
Dr Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Applying to Integrated Knowledge Translation Funding
Opportunities at CIHR: Tips for Success
Mr Ryan McCarthy and
Mr Adrian Mota
Leading for Quality and Safety
Dr Deborah White
Participants attending KT Canada Summer Institutes
# of Attendees
Trainee Level (%)
Trainee Demographics (%)
Trainee Language (%)
Exploring the Knowledge to Action Framework
Master's: 7 PhD: 80
Post Doc: 13
British Columbia: 7
Nova Scotia: 3
Developing KT Interventions
Post Doc: 28
Integrating the Science and Practice of KT
Post Doc: 29
British Columbia: 3.2
Level of Training
# of Funded Trainees
Demographics of Funded Trainees
# of Funded Trainees
University of Alberta
University of British Colombia
University of Ottawa/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
University of Toronto
Planned or Actual Output
KT Trainee Collaborative
Trainees from past summer institutes came together to create a network of KT trainees
1. Two CIHR meeting, planning and dissemination grants for meetings in Winnipeg (Mar 2010) and Toronto (Apr 2011)
2. Poster presentation at KT 10 meeting in Halifax Jun 2010 (Colquhoun et al.)
3. Poster presentation at Family Medicine Forum meeting in Vancouver Oct 2010 (Urquhart et al.)
4. Poster presentation at RTNA meeting in Edmonton Oct 2011 (Richmond et al.)
5. Publication: Cornelissen E, Urquhart R, Chan V et al. Creating a knowledge translation collaborative: from conceptualization to lessons learned in the first year. Implementation Science 2011; 6:98
Summer Institute Publications
Trainees from the CIHR sponsored KT summer institute (2008) and the 2009 KT Canada summer institute (SI) have published two meeting reports in Implementation Science
1. Kho M, Estey E, Deforge R et al.
Riding the knowledge translation roundabout: lessons learned from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Summer Institute in knowledge translation. Implementation Science 2009;4:33
2. Leung BY, Catallo C, Riediger ND, Cahill NE, and Kastner M. The trainees' plan on developing and end-of-grant knowledge translation plan. Implementation Science 2010;5:78
3. Bhogal S, Menon A, Bath B et al.
Using problem-based case studies to learn about knowledge translation interventions: An inside perspective. Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professionals. In Press
CIHR Knowledge Synthesis Grant
Trainees and investigators across multiple sites collaborated on a synthesis grant to strengthen their understanding of the concept of replication and identify a useful framework to guide replication research in KT
1. Grant awarded from CIHR for $96,352 to investigators at OHRI (Grimshaw, Brehaut, Moher), SMH (Straus), McMaster (McKibbon), U of Alberta (Sales) and trainees at OHRI (Curran, Vachon)
2. Review of the social science, education, business, and health literature using multiple search strategies to identify relevant literature and a theory analysis to identify and define major concepts and elements.
3. Model case approach to examine the extent to which replication research is evident in knowledge translation research.
4. Invite knowledge users and stakeholders to participate in development of recommendations for replication research practice for researchers, policy makers, funders and journal editors.
Two trainees from the 2010 SI along with investigators from the OHRI are working on a KT Intervention to improve the long-term use of evidence-based medication in patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. This is currently in the planning phase.
1. Collaboration between trainees from McMaster (Schwalm) and U of Toronto (Ivers), investigators at OHRI (Grimshaw, Taljaard) and at McMaster (Natarajan)
2. Provincial baseline assessment of discontinuation rates of CV medications in patients over 65 years old post cath
3. Small feasibility trial in STEMI patients
4. LHIN-wide randomized controlled clinical trails
Collaboration with University of Newcastle, Australia
Prof Robert Sanson-Fisher, a member of KT Canada's scientific advisory board, attended the 2010 summer institute and offered to host trainees in Australia, a testimony to the strength of our trainees
This collaboration is currently in the planning phase, and the KT Canada steering committee is exploring other possible opportunities with members of the scientific advisory and other interested international KT leaders
Graduate students are expected to do a KT-focused thesis that may include supervision from mentors at more than one participating institution. Graduate students and fellows from disciplines including clinical epidemiology, informatics, nursing, medicine, psychology, health policy, business, computer science, and engineering amongst others are brought together through this program and encouraged to work together. More than 60 faculty members from across Canada are involved with the training initiative and are available to provide mentorship. All of the faculty hold CIHR grants as principal investigators for KT research projects. New trainees meet with the Program Director to explore their interests and goals. This discussion is used to identify potential mentors if the trainee does not have one. During the Summer Institute, opportunities to meet with the potential mentors are available. These opportunities include a 'speed mentoring' session on the first day that invites the trainees to meet with multiple potential mentors during 15-minute sessions. These sessions are focused on identifying if there is interest in exploring a mentoring relationship. Trainees also have the opportunity to meet with other mentees who work with that mentor to determine if it might be a good fit. Longer meeting sessions are then available on the second day of the Summer Institute to facilitate mentorship. Our mentorship approach is based on the results of three systematic reviews of mentorship and a large qualitative study of mentorship that we completed [13–15]. For example, we found that assigning mentors can lead to a superficial or artificial relationship, and instead it is preferred that mentees are given a list of potential mentors and provided with opportunities to meet with each.
Each Stream 1 trainee is expected to complete an annual learning profile and objectives, which are reviewed with their primary mentors. A summary is reviewed with the trainee and the Program Director during a yearly interview to discuss progress and concerns. The mentors and Program Director work together to create sustainable momentum in supporting KT research careers, to provide trainees with skills for lifelong success and collaboration, and to foster an attitude of lifelong learning.
Eligible applicants for Stream 1 include trainees enrolled in a graduate program or fellowship with a focus on KT. We encourage applicants from across Canada. Each application is independently reviewed by two KT researchers using a standard scale used by the CIHR review panels. Candidates with the highest scores are offered a stipend and the opportunity to participate in the training activities described above. Details of the application process are provided in Additional File 1. We open the Summer Institute to trainees who do not receive Stream 1 funding and use a similar application process to that described above.
Stream 2 training
Training in the principles of KT is available for researchers and trainees from other fields using distance-learning technologies. The core competencies for this stream include training in both end-of-grant KT and integrated KT. A one-day, in-person session on end-of-grant KT is available and we are currently working to make this available online. We have also implemented a modular, integrated KT course, reflecting the knowledge to action loop. This course has been offered to a number of groups; for example, we have developed a partnership with the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (a funding agency responsible for healthcare research in British Columbia) and the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute (an organization involving seven hospitals and various research programs) to provide a number of courses and have recently submitted a grant to evaluate impact over two years. Modules on end-of-grant KT and integrated KT are also available for online completion (http://ktclearinghouse.ca/). The KT handbook, entitled 'Knowledge Translation in Healthcare'  provides the basis for courses developed for this stream.
Stream 3 training
Stream 3 targets decision makers (including clinicians, healthcare managers, and policy makers) who want to know more about what KT is and how to do it in their own setting. Two courses are available to focus on the core competency of how to implement a KT project in their organisation: a brief introductory session providing an overview of KT and a modular course that including the basics of KT, and an opportunity for participants to apply them directly to a project in their own setting. This latter course has been held on two occasions including colleagues from 16 teams. Topics include: what is KT, how can I do KT in my own setting, and how do I implement, monitor and sustain KT strategies in my own setting?
Mentorship is a key component of this initiative and while the key mentors have extensive mentorship expertise, ongoing faculty development will be available for mentors and Stream 1 trainees. A mentorship program and tools have been developed based on our research including several systematic reviews on this topic [13–15]. Mentorship tools (e.g., individual development plans, interactive case discussions) have been used at sessions including the Summer Institutes and will be evaluated in this training initiative. We are also completing a series of interviews with expert mentors to provide strategies and tactics for effective mentorship and these are available online. Our work is aimed to give trainees the skills and professional training that will allow them to become leaders in KT and KT research and to mentor future generations of researchers.
Evaluation of the KT Canada Training Initiative
Ensuring that this training initiative meets its objectives will require a multicomponent process. Core measures will include: number of trainees in each of the three streams (and their discipline); numbers of publications, research presentations, grants, honours, programs developed and implemented by trainees, impact of research, and engagement with relevant stakeholders; and number of KT researchers recruited and retained. Summative evaluation will include surveying participants from all three streams about their perceptions and experiences with this initiative and its effect on employment, position, and their practice of KT; and, surveying team members about their experiences and perceptions of the initiative. In a formative evaluation strategy, each year a sample of trainees from each of the three streams will be invited to participate in a semi-structured interview to explore their experiences with the initiative, their perceptions of effective/ineffective components and to propose revisions to the training program. The results of these evaluations will be used to continuously refine and improve this initiative.
Costs of the Program
This program is funded by the CIHR ($1.7 million over six years) and two-thirds of the funding must be used for student stipends. We have obtained additional grant support to provide activities such as the Summer Institute. We are actively seeking partnerships to sustain and grow the program. For example, we have a partnership with the British Medical Journal to fund fellows interested in KT and health informatics and are exploring similar partnerships with other interested stakeholders including provincial funding agencies.
Strengths of this initiative include unique linkages with relevant stakeholder audiences and the tremendous breadth and depth of expertise of the members in KT and KT research. These linkages will facilitate sustainability of the training. Furthermore, sustainability will be enhanced through offering courses to our collaborators from decision-maker organisations as well as to our colleagues from other training and research initiatives. Ultimately through this initiative, we hope to meet the capacity demand for KT researchers and practitioners in Canada that will lead to improved care and a strengthened healthcare system.
Drs. Straus, Légaré, Lavis, and Grimshaw hold Canada Research Chairs. Dr. Majumdar receives career support from Alberta Innovates Health Solutions.
- McGlynn E, Asch S, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 2635-45. 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM: Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 61 (3): 319-341. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle V, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner DR: Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27 (5): 554-74. 10.1177/0272989X07307319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shah BR, Mamdani M, Jaakkimainen L, Hux JE: Risk modification for diabetic patients. Are other risk factors treated as diligently as glycemia?. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 11 (2): e239-e244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pimlott NJ, Hux JE, Wilson LM, Kahan M, Li C, Rosser WW: Educating physicians to reduce benzodiazepine use by elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2003, 168 (7): 835-839.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy J, Quan H, Ghali WA, Feasby TE: Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces. CMAJ. 2004, 171 (5): 455-459. 10.1503/cmaj.1040170.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hutchinson A, Estabrooks C: Theories of KT: Educational theories. Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Edited by: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. 2009, Oxford: Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- Lewis AP, Bolden KJ: General practitioners and their learning styles. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989, 39: 187-199.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council Guidance: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new MRC guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: 979-83. 10.1136/bmj.a979.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006, 26 (1): 13-24. 10.1002/chp.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Accessed June 2010, [http://ktclearinghouse.ca]
- Kho M, Estey E, DeForge R, Mak L, Bell BL: Riding the knowledge translation roundabout: lessons learned from the CIHR Summer Institute in Knowledge Translation. Implementation Science. 2009, 4: 33-10.1186/1748-5908-4-33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A: The impact of mentorship: systematic review. JAMA. 2006, 296: 1103-15. 10.1001/jama.296.9.1103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M: Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: A qualitative study. Academic Medicine. 2009, 84: 135-9. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819301ab.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Straus SE, Graham ID, Lockyer J, on behalf of the Alberta Mentorship Working Group: Development of a mentorship strategy. A KT Case Study. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008, 28: 117-22. 10.1002/chp.179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Edited by: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. 2009, Oxford: Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.